Abstract

Objectives:: The treatment options for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures remain a topic of controversy. Short-segment percutaneous fixation (SSPF) and short-segment open fixation including the fractured level (SSOFIFL) are both viable procedures for managing these fractures. At present, there is a lack of evidence in the literature demonstrating the absolute superiority of one treatment over the other. This study aimed to compare these two surgical strategies with a focus on radiological and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods:: This retrospective casecontrol multicenter analysis involved patients with A3 and A4 vertebral fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (T11L2) who underwent surgical treatment with either SSPF or SSOFIFL in the participating centers. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale (VAS) both pre- and postoperatively. Radiological outcomes included kyphotic deformity (KD), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), segmental kyphosis, and sagittal alignment parameters. Results:: A total of 156 patients were enrolled in the study, with 81 patients in Group A (SSPF) and 75 patients in Group B (SSOFIFL). Group B demonstrated better correction of KD (Group B: 3.4 2.7 vs. Group A: 8.3 3.2, P = 0.003), AVBH, and sagittal alignment. A minor loss of correction was observed in Group B with respect to Group A (0.9 1.7 vs 4.3 2.1, P = 0.043). Blood losses were lower in Group A (78 15 min vs. 118 23 min, P = 0.021) as well as during surgery (121.3 34 mL vs. 210.2 52 mL, P = 0.031), but the post-operative hemoglobin levels were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion:: SSOFIFL appears to show a major amount of KD correction and prevent loss of correction. This technique should be the preferred choice whenever possible. However, SSPF can be considered a valid alternative for damage control in polytrauma patients and fractures with low KD.