Abstract

Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery

Abstract


INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50 degrees will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50 degrees . The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50 degrees to prevent reprogression as well as improve the quality of life. The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and significance in lifestyle improvement of pedicle screw-only fixation system versus the more common hybrid instrumentation system used for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving two groups of patients were included in the study. One group was operated with pedicle screw-only method while the other with hybrid instrumentation system. The pre- and post-operative Cobb's angles were taken across a follow-up of 4 years. An SRS-30 questionnaire was given in a yearly follow-up to assess the lifestyle improvement of the patient. RESULTS: Pedicle screw-only method was significantly more effective in reducing Cobb's angle (P = 0.0487). It was showed less loss of correction (P = 0.009) pedicle screw-only surgery was also better at reducing thoracic curves (P = 0.001). There seemed a better recovery time with pedicle screw surgery (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws are more effective and durable than hybrid systems at when treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.

OTHER FORMATS

ACTIONS

RESOURSES